In principle I'm not against marriage, but to everything its time. I had proposed to
girls to simply meet, and spend interesting time together, but they reject this offer. Why? Girls, who register with marriage agencies and place their profiles on the introduction sites, have a very specific goal.
They want to create a family. Therefore they don.t desire to waste time on the "unimportant" relationships.
Time works against women in a much harsher way than against the men. with age a Man has accumulated experience, wisdom,
and has created for himself a stable material position and social status. And if in the process of life he has managed to
retain his reserve of vital energy, then his attractiveness for women and chances to create a family are not reduced in the
slightest. Moreover, his range of selection only increases with the years. A solidly established man of middle
age can be married to both their contemporary and a young woman who may be his daughter's age.
For women everything is opposite. Even if she has succeeded in preserving health and attractiveness, her rating and
ability to be selective falls sharply with the years. In the society it is generally not accepted for women to be married
to men older then her. Financially secure men of middle age usually prefer younger women. All that remains for her
choose from are either feeble old men or men who have failed to succeed in life. With such a "selection" many women who
have missed their time choose to remain in solitude.
It goes without saying; there are numerous young women and women of any age, who simply desire to be entertained.
Particularly if at someone else's expense. However, it's better to search for them not on the introduction sites,
but elsewhere. Back to top
My friends surf through all the dating sites, attempting to find girls considerably younger then themselves, however I'm more attracted to my contemporaries. Friends say that I simply fear not managing with a young wife, but this is not true. How do I explain this to them? Let us begin with the fact that you have the right to your own selection and you are not obligated to justify it even to the closest friends. Many problems arise because now and then we are subjected to the public opinion in resolution of strictly personal and intimate questions.The preference for women of specific age as candidates for a wife is guided not only by aesthetic and sexual tastes, but also by your ideas about your role in the family relationship.
Many men desire to be unconditional leaders in the family. They are ready to make all decisions individually and take full weight of responsibility upon themselves. In our century of democracy and equality of sexual rights an age difference tends to give a certain shape to relationship. It's easier for a mature man to affirm his leadership position to a much younger woman.However, there are men who see marriage as an equal partnership. For them the wife is first of all a close and reliable friend and advocate. They prefer to discuss all debatable questions and problems together, and to make joint decisions. Such relationships are more easily built with a woman of an age approximately identical to yourself. Back to top
Recently I wrote a letter to a young woman. Almost a month passed, but I still did not
get an answer. Had it been myself, even if I did not want to continue our acquaintance, I would have
nevertheless answered, honestly telling her about how I felt. Maybe something had happened to her?
Or I did write something that that she did not find worthy of even refusing a reply to me? We are used to evaluating others according to our own form and substance, assuming that in the analogous
situations all must feel the same as we, and to behave just as we do. Unfortunately, this is usually
not true. Otherwise the problems of compatability and mutual understanding would never appear, there
would be no necessity for psychological tests, and any couple would be ideal.
A person, who is responsible, conscientious, and incapable of leaving someone's letter without an
answer, can't imagine that a woman could just simply forget to answer. Especially, if she receives
many letters or is not very serious about the questions of meeting someone. Possibly, she created her
profile simply for the entertainment value and forgot about it the next day. Such women can be "assessed"
in to our test under the section LOW EARTH.
Her irresponsibility does not necessarily mean that she is not at all capable of building family
relations. She can get along with a man very well, particularly one who more easily relates to the
female "forgetfulness", without a tendency to portray similar situations in dark colors and without
making oneself feel guilty of the most terrible sins.
However the reason for her silence can be much simpler, and you worry completely in vain. The fact
is that in Russia computers are not yet present in every apartment, and far from all girls can access
the electronic mail as regularly and easily as telephones numbers. Possibly, the woman you wrote to is
simply away elsewhere at the time, and she had not seen your letter and therefore has no idea how to
reply to you.
It is for this reason that our service for introductions has available not only a virtual site, but
also a real marriage agency complete with its office and technical support base. Our entire staff
works like professionals you would expect in circumstances such as these. Talk with us, and possibly
the situation will be resolved by itself. Back to top
I have just found out that a young woman with whom I had been corresponding also writes
to other men. When I wrote to her questioning this behavior, she replied that she probably wasn't the
only woman I wrote to either. It would seem the situation is trivial. Acquaintance via correspondence doesn't obligate either man
or woman to anything. After noting someone as a possible candidate, each has the right to continue searching. At this stage they are both equaly placed.
However the situation changes after both have established a definite agreement about a meeting. After
all, it's a man not a woman who expends his personal time and money on the trip. clearly he does not
want, after arriving in the strange country, to find himself in a queue.
Young women, which continue to correspond with several men even after they agree about meeting with a
specific man, most likely don't intend to either relocate anywhere or to marry. Most likely, they
simply want to be entertained at someone else's expense. Back to top
I heard that majority of men prefer blonds. However I also heard that brunettes are
more spirited. Could you tell me if this is true? Men's preference for blonds in essence originated in fashion trend that existed half a century ago.
The means The image Merlin Monroe - the best known sex symbol in America - unsettles fantasies of men from
different generations even until now. Many of them do not even suspect that the real Merlin Norma was
dark-haired and somewhat distant woman, who had nothing in common with appetizing and inviting heroines
she portrayed.
There are relatively few blonds in the world. Dark hair provides better protection from the sun, therefore
people who originate in the tropical latitudes, are usually dark brown or dark-haired persons. In spite
of the widespread opinion, native northerners can also have dark hair, since hair color in these latitudes has no practical value. Furthermore, dark gene is usually dominant, and in a couple where one has dark, and another light hair, children will usually be born dark-haired.
All this makes natural blondes a certain "rarity". if a man relates to the woman only as to a rare
object of prestige, capable of enhancing his image, then he will undoubtedly prefer a blond.
From the above it is clear that the blonds represent a narrow genetic segment of the population and
their blood contains many related genes. This can become a reason for weak vitality. Women with the
darker color hair are usually more healthy, hardy, and, as a result, are more spirited. However in
case of each individual's temperament - characteristics are strictly confined to that person. Back to top
I am fond of the eastern direction in sex. Are they harmful to the European? The culture inherent in certain nation is formed from the conditions of its dwelling and physiological features. The culture of sex is not exception.
In China, in the native land of Dao Love, there is high population density from antiquity. The poor nature was unable to
provide everybody with high level food, therefore the fibers necessary for a man's organism for development of sperm, did not suffice. So one of technique of Dao Love - the deduction of sperm- was created , an orgasm without ejaculation..
Many men have suffered because of conviction that if they do not spend reserve ammunition they will constantly be in a
condition of readiness. But their organism that has got used to develop sperm in enough quantity from youth, continues to
do it, causing overflow of seminal vesicles. The liquid arises during orgasms and the pressure of the liquid which can not
find an output, leeds to the damage of walls of these vesicles and inflammatory processes.
Kama Sutra, as well as yoga, is not the collection of exercises for acrobats, but the arch of rituals of ancient Indian
culture. A certain emotional state is connected to each ritual the same as for us the process of decorating of a christmas
tree is connected to the sensation of a holiday. A variety of ritual poses of Kama Sutra allows to reach essentially
different emotional states. But these states and not external attributes like poses are the basic wealth of any culture.
But for people who were not absorbing the culture of the East since the childhood, rituals of Kama Sutra will be no more than acrobatic tricks. Is it good to suffer inconveniences and instead of receiving pleasure, think of how not to become a disabled? Back to top
